Re: Deliverable for Action 72 @headers

Gez Lemon wrote:
> 2008/8/23 James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>:
>> For example, in the table under discussion [1]
> 
> The table under discussion shouldn't be the one you're referring to. I
> provided 3 examples for testing - two that were marked up accessibly,
> and one that wasn't marked up accessibly. You're referring to the one
> that wan't marked up accessibly. The table that should be under
> discussion (the example used in the bug reports) is the complex data
> table that uses headers:
> http://juicystudio.com/wcag/tables/complexdatatable.html

OK, but I don't think this makes any substantive difference to anything that I 
said. Have I missed something?

-- 
"Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?"
  -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

Received on Saturday, 23 August 2008 20:09:25 UTC