- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:13:34 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
- CC: wai-xtech@w3.org
Sander Tekelenburg wrote: > At 14:19 -0500 UTC, on 2007-09-03, Jon Barnett wrote: >> Remember that "accessibility" doesn't just mean "readable to blind people". > > Within the W3C space, it does. I dislike it, but I think we need to be > realistic about it. Does it ? I understood it meant "accessible to people who do not have the ability to respond to all sensory stimuli in the same way as is generally accepted as 'normal'". I've never seen this definition, but from earlier discussions this was the meaning I gleaned. Philip Taylor
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:14:24 UTC