W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > wai-xtech@w3.org > November 2007

Re: DRAFT response Re[2]: Request for PFWG WAI review of Omitting ?alt Attribute for Critical Content

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:01:05 +0000
Message-ID: <474CAFC1.9050501@splintered.co.uk>
To: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
CC: Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net>, wai-xtech@w3.org

David Poehlman wrote:
> Surely, there is no element or attribute anywhere in any spec that would 
> say, when you publish your documents, not only must you use an alt attrib, 
> you also must write into it that the image is not important if it is not 
> important.

I don't see this as being any different from, say in HTML 4.01, 
recognised link types


recognised media types


IANA registry charsets


etc. Or am I missing something fundamental in your argument?

Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:01:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:27 UTC