- From: Evans, Donald <Donald.Evans@corp.aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:04:44 -0500
- To: "John Foliot" <foliot@wats.ca>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>
This points out one of my main issues I have with WCAG. The issue of the aggregator. You seem to think that because the errors are coming from an iFrame provided by Google you are in some way relieved of the responsibility. In fact under the WCAG 2 guidelines you are not. Although we have added a "Partial Conformance Claim" to WCAG 2, any error is considered to be your problem because the URL is your domain. I don't agree with this position, and I am impressed with the level of conformance you have achieved. ---don -----Original Message----- From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Foliot Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 7:27 PM To: wai-xtech@w3.org Subject: RE: DHTML Style Guide: http://dev.aol.com/dhtml_style_guide Evans, Donald wrote: > Maybe we can share that can of dog food? > > http://www.wats.ca > This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict! > Failed validation, 13 Errors > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wats.ca%2F&charset= > %2 > 8detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0 > First, apologies to Don, whom I called Dan in my diatribe to Mr. Johnson. Sorry Don. Second, validation results for WATS.ca previously posted as HTML rich email "screen capture" was provided by the Firefox HTML Validator plug-in, developed by Marc Gueury [http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/], which is "...based on Tidy and OpenSP. Both algorithms were originally developed by the Web Consortium W3C. And now extended and improved by a lot of persons. Both algorithms are embedded inside Mozilla/Firefox and makes the validation locally on your machine, without sending HTML to a third party server." It appears that the plug-in (which shows my content as validating, but the code being generated by the GoogleAds block causing the validation errors) and the W3C validator have some disagreement over some of my authored source code, and I will investigate further. JF
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:05:07 UTC