- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:35:58 +0200
- To: <wai-xtech@w3.org>
At 07:51 12/10/2005, Gottfried Zimmermann wrote: >To my knowledge, we would prefer <xsd:appinfo> if the semantics statement >was machine readable. I agree. An example of this is the Schema Adjunct Framework (SAF, a proposal to complement XML Schemas with the information needed to generate applications): see http://www.tibco.com/software/standards_support/xmlresources/spec.html and http://www.tibco.com/software/standards_support/xmlresources/beyond_schemas.htm. Eric van der Vlist's book "XML Schema" contains an example where <xs:appinfo> contains Dublin Core metadata and an example with RDDL (Chapter 14: Documenting Schemas - see http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema/). >If we just describe it in words (with no further >machine-readable markup) i would prefer to put it in <xsd:annotation>. Eric van der Vlist's book contains examples with XHTML and even SVG inside <xs:annotation>. Regards, Christophe Strobbe >Gottfried > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: wai-xtech-request@w3.org > > [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Al Gilman > > Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2005 23:36 > > An: wai-xtech@w3.org > > Betreff: xsd:appinfo for formal semantics in XSD > > > > > > > > > > At times we have talked about embedding formally-expressed > > semantics in <xsd:annotation>. > > > > On a call I was on recently, one of the mavens there gently > > suggested that we might better put this in <xsd:appinfo>. > > > > For more, see for example > > > > http://www.w3.org/2005/06/21-xsd-user-minutes.html > > > > Al > > -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2005 09:36:57 UTC