- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:59:50 -0500
- To: wai-xtech@w3.org
John Foliot has provided a fresh recapitulation of the arguments against the inclusion of @key on xhtml2:access. http://www.wats.ca/articles/xhtmlroleaccessmodulestillflawed/80 Several accessibility worthies have posted support for this position on www-html. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2005Nov/thread.html I see two levels of questions: ** functional requirements: Should authors be suggesting key bindings for accelerated functions in their Web Aps? ** design details: [Presuming that there is a valid requirement to afford authors the opportunity to nominate key bindings, as they nominate other styling in CSS stylesheets, for example...] In the emerging XHTML2 generation of technologies, EMMA, sXBL, etc, is there a 'right way' that this could have been done but it's missing in the available toolkit at this time? Is there a better migration path through existing technology ( such as script ) that affords as good accessibility results without a detour into a potentially "deprecated on introduction" placeholder feature? Al
Received on Friday, 18 November 2005 16:00:14 UTC