Re: Survey for profiles and rel values

As I can only sanely subscribe to a finite number of discussion lists, I
am also sending this to you directly in hopes that it is of some help.
If this discussion spills onto some of the other W3C lists I monitor
(www-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org, wai-ig@w3.org) I will continue in
that forum.

Regarding relative links, one which has always been endorsed, but never
actually defined (to my surprise) is that for P3P:

	<link rel="P3Pv1" ... (or whichever version used)
[http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P/#syntax_link]

I would also suggest: 

	AUTHOR
(It would be nice if this could also be expanded to cover multiple
authors:
   <link rel="Author" href="/expertise/" title="Authors" />
   <link rel="Individual_Authors" href="/expertise/derekfeatherstone/7"
title="Derek Featherstone" />
   <link rel="Individual_Authors" href="/expertise/johnfoliot/8"
title="John Foliot" />)

	BOOKMARK 
(which already has some browser support - again multiple instances would
be great)

	POLICY (Policies? Privacy?)
(Related to P3P, but envisioned as direct links to human readable
policies, as required by some legal and/or internal policy requirements)

	EARL 
(Oh that I wish EARL was taken more seriously...)
	

Finally, there are a number of articles to be found at WATS.ca on <link>
which may or may not be relevant:

	http://www.wats.ca/articles/missinglink/49
	http://www.wats.ca/articles/extendinglinkrelationships/53

JF
--
John Foliot  foliot@wats.ca
Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca
Web Accessibility Testing and Services
http://www.wats.ca   
Phone: 1-613-482-7053  
	

Received on Saturday, 12 November 2005 14:07:18 UTC