- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:05:41 +0200
- To: wai-xtech@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi Al, At 17:21 18/08/2005, Al Gilman wrote: >At 7:35 PM +0200 8/17/05, Christophe Strobbe wrote: >>(...) >>The comments in the attached HTML file were written as requests, comments >>etc to the HTML WG. >>Some comments are related to accessibility: these can all be found by >>searching the word "accessibility" (marked with <strong> and in red) in >>the document. (...) > >Christophe, > >(...) >I (...) suggest that you post these on >www-html as personal questions without waiting for further comment. OK. Would you like me to feed back comments from www-html if they are related to accessibility? >I suspect that various of the ones flagged as accessibility concerns >may have simple technical answers, such as that if the content model in a >DTD says PCDATA, then markup *is* acceptable in that content. Then I have been misinterpreting SGML and XML DTDs for more than 5 years. As far as I know, if a content model says, e.g. <!ELEMENT TEXTAREA - - (#PCDATA)> then no element content is allowed. (See also "mixed content" in XML 1.0: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/#sec-mixed-content.) >(...) >In your @@todo: improve stylesheet notation -- >Do you mean that you are taking back an action item to propose >improvements or you are asking them to improve it. If the latter, >you will be most effective with concrete suggestions such as the >one about making sure that background and foreground text >colors are set atomically (both or neither) in the style rules. The '@@todo: improve stylesheet' was a reminder to myself, but it is unlikely that I will find time to add more suggestions. (The HTML WG knows the default style sheet needs more work.) Christophe >Al > -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2005 16:06:46 UTC