Re: Comments on 27 May 2005 WD of XHTML 2.0

Hi,

Perhaps my original message [1] was too cryptic.
The comments in the attached HTML file were written as requests, comments 
etc to the HTML WG.
Some comments are related to accessibility: these can all be found by 
searching the word "accessibility" (marked with <strong> and in red) in the 
document. Some of these comments have to do with the way certain elements 
are defined (e.g. object); others have to do with bad practices shown in 
code examples.
All of this is offered to mailing list to see if there's anything that PFWG 
or any other group in WAI wants to pass on to the HTML WG. If there is no 
discussion, I'll just send the document to 
<mailto:www-html@w3.org>www-html@w3.<mailto:www-html@w3.org>org.

Regards,

Christophe Strobbe


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2005Aug/0000.html

At 18:32 10/08/2005, you wrote:
>Dear list members,
>
>Please find attached an HTML file with comments on the 27 May 2005 Working 
>Draft of XHTML 2.0. Some comments are related to accessibility and could 
>be discussed on this list.
>
>Regards,
>
>Christophe Strobbe
>(WCAG WG participant)
>
>P.S. The main motivation for writing these comments is the WCAG 2.0 test 
>suite for XHTML 2.0 that will be produced by the BenToWeb project 
>(www.bentoweb.org). This explains the requests for clarifications.

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/

Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:36:55 UTC