- From: Matt May <mcmay@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:37:11 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Cc: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>, 'wai-xtech' <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > <quote who="Matt May"> > >>5. Conformance reporting mechanisms for WCAG 2 > > > For the most part, EARL is already working for this. Sidar and W3C have > both produced tools which output the latest version of EARL, and there are > a number of tools which output earlier versions. I'm sorry, you're misunderstanding me. I'm not talking about evaluations, I'm talking about site-based conformance claims and scope. There are remaining questions in WCAG, such as what constitutes a resource, which need to be resolved before EARL becomes an obvious solution to the WG. That's going to require coordination between WCAG, ER, and our SemWeb friends. "Use EARL" is not a sufficient answer to this problem. - m
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2004 16:36:46 UTC