RE: meta comments on XML Accessibility Guidelines - n images

Ian said:
> Is this really for XAG?
  Then ref'd other wai docs covering every item :-)
> I don't see any format requirements in the above
> statements.

?format requirements Ian? 

> For XAG, the requirement is to allow
> the author to specify equivalents.

I'll only echo Pauls comments; I found nothing relating to n images?
At least for him, we needed more. Perhaps a one liner at least, if
n images repeat n times? I still think that misses the point I made
re (admittedly UA related) sequencing and confusion instigatted by
authoring techniques.

Perhaps there is a 'not applicable' answer to him? At least when
relating cleanly to XML.


 See a long list
> of suggested XAG requirements starting "Allow the author to..."
> in:
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2002Sep/0028

Paul would still need to extrapolate from that though?

regards DaveP

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 08:49:02 UTC