- From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 15:56:11 +0100
- To: charles@w3.org
- Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
> Ian said: > > - I think checkpoints 1.2 and 2.1 are so general as to be > > not that useful. Please be more specific; pick the most > > important cases and make a few extra checkpoints. > > Perhaps for 1.2 revert to the example of > <mediaExample> > <imgObj>... > <textObj> ... > <audioObj> ... > </mediaExample> > > To demonstrate the 'flexibility' mentioned. > CMN. > The problem is that this doesn't, in my opinion, meet the > requirement in the > best possible way. It limits the flexibility to a few > specific types, unless > it is clear that additional types can be added. Yes, add away, perhaps that needs to be made clear. Syntax perhaps should KISS, i.e. avoid xlink unless we think the world undestands it? Regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 14th June 2002 is RNIB Look Loud Day - visit http://www.lookloud.org.uk to find out all about it.
Received on Monday, 15 April 2002 10:57:10 UTC