- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 05 Apr 2002 10:44:37 +0200
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org
le mar 02-04-2002 à 15:55, Al Gilman a écrit : > OK I looked at them. In a quasi decision-tree development: > > ? At the top level of the decision tree, to include a navbar like this or not: > > .. definite yes, but > > ? At the head of the page, in order from outer scope to inner scope? > > .. can live with this. I believe that there is a genuine cross-current between what is fluent and usable in vision and in speech in this regard. For speech the optimum thing would be to have all these links present in the page but after the main content and in ascending order of breadth of scope, from inner to outer. *But,* on one key condition: > > ? What broke? The skip link. The skip-nav link should be the first > or second link encountered as one processes the page in tabbing order > on opening the page from a URI-reference with no #fragment qualifier. Would it be enough to put a tabindex=1 (or 2) on the skip-nav link? And then put the following tabindex back to the navigation bar? Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C's Webmaster mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 03:44:39 UTC