- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:17:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
- cc: WAI Cross-group list <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Well, implementing it like that would be an improvement. I am hoping that Amaya's implementation will be allowing this choice soon. The weakness in the current spec (in my opinion) is that this is not clear. Therefore it is possible to use two implementations that conform to the current specification, and be confused about the behaviour because it is different. Cheers Charles McCN On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, gregory j. rosmaita wrote: the ambiguity in the HTML4 technical recommendation as to the "expected action" that a user agent should/must take when an "accesskey" is invoked is actually a strength, in that it enables the user to choose whether or not to "move focus to" the element for which an "accesskey" has been defined, or to "activate" the element for which the "accesskey" has been defined -- the minimum requirement for a user agent should be a configuration option which allows the user to select whether to establish focus on or to activate the element for which an "accesskey" has been defined; a more advanced (and far more useful/flexible) technique would be to endow the user with on-the-fly control over the setting -- a simple toggling mechanism of the sort that opera implements so well for providing control over the rendering of a document from the keyboard, but, of course, one which is invoked programmatically, so that it can be toggled/triggered in a device independent manner)
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2001 04:17:54 UTC