- From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@teleline.es>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 19:42:13 +0200
- To: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@reef.com>
- Cc: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>, "WAI Cross-group list" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Thank you for the splendid explanation, Gregory. But an alphabet is also: A system of characters or symbols representing sounds or things. And a Chinese alphabet exists. And naturally a Chinese text in the Web will be alphanumeric, it will use characters and numbers of the Chinese alphabet. I think so! kind regards, Emmanuelle ----- Original Message ----- From: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net> To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@reef.com> Cc: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>; "Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo" <emmanuelle@teleline.es>; "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>; "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>; "WAI Cross-group list" <wai-xtech@w3.org> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 7:15 PM Subject: Re: definition Re: RE Checkpoint 3.4 again > On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Kynn Bartlett wrote: > > Is Chinese considered "alphanumeric" BTW? > > generally speaking, the term for a symbolic figure or character is a > "glyph", although there is also a specialized usage of the term which > refers to symbols which convey information nonverbally -- which, to an > extent, is what that which western europeans and their cultural > descendents generally consider "text" _does_ through centuries of usage, > custom, and "refinement"... > > as for distinctions, alphanumeric is generally understood in computing (in > the broad sense of the word!) circles as consisting of both letters and > numbers (often including other symbols, such as mathematical/chemical > symbols, punctuation marks, etc.) > > an ideogram (at least academically speaking) is a picture or symbol used > in a system of writing (called "ideography") to represent a thing or an > idea, but not the precise word or phrase for the thing which is > represented (hence one of the needs for ruby for ideographic ); strictly > speaking, an ideogram does not "literally" represent the object or > concept(s) which comprise the ideogram -- rather, they suggest a concept > or idea, and it is that concept or idea that the ideogram represents; > > and then there's the antithesis of the ideogram, the "logogram", which is > a letter, symbol or sign which is used to represent an entire word (such > as the copyright and trademark symbol -- or the ampersand (&) > > oh, and as for the components of alphanumeric, an "alphabet" is simply > a collection of letters, with a letter being defined as a symbol > representing a speech sound, while a numeral is the basic unit of a > symbolic system of enumerators... > > ain'tcha glad you asked? > gregory. > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > ERUDITION, n. Dust shaken out of a book into an empty skull. > Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's Dictionary_ > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net > Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html > ------------------------------------------------------------- > >
Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 13:44:57 UTC