Re[5]: charter update with two year cycle

Thanks for the input. Comments noted.

Proposed new schedule will be on its way soon for the working group to 
comment etc.

Josh

------ Original Message ------
From: "Katie Haritos-Shea" <ryladog@gmail.com>
To: "Joshue O Connor" <josh@interaccess.ie>; wai-wcag-editor@w3.org
Cc: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: 10/10/2016 12:39:54
Subject: Re: Re[3]: charter update with two year cycle

>Josh and WCAG Editors,
>
>Thanks, my comments are:
>
>1. I like some of the new ideas in this version.
>
>2. All places where it says "low vision or cognitive disabilities", 
>please replace 'or' with 'and'. So it should read: low vision and 
>cognitive disabilities
>
>3. Where can we see the schedule for the updates is documented in the 
>AG WG Project Management Plan?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Katie Haritos-Shea
>703-371-5545
>
>
>On Oct 10, 2016 6:00 AM, "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie> 
>wrote:
>>Hi Katie and all,
>>
>>Katie said:
>> >I would ask again, especially of the chairs, if a regular cycle >must 
>>be defined, why compromise, apparently, is no longer >an option in 
>>this WG any more. Why is there no ability to >compromise between 10 
>>and 2? on say 3, 4 or 5 years?
>>
>>Of course there is. All of this work is about the line between our end 
>>users requirements and the needs and wants of the group members etc. 
>>So we are working towards a compromise/workable solution. I urge 
>>everyone to take a breath. There is a new draft that the group will 
>>get a chance to give two or three cents on but we have been listening, 
>>and take very seriously yours (and others) ardent concerns. [1]
>>
>>Notice that details of timeframe etc are being moved out of the 
>>charter to a seperate 'AG WG Project Management Plan' doc that is 
>>being worked on.
>>
>>More details to follow.
>>
>>I appreciated e'ones input on this but think it is time to find some 
>>zen space to let this evolve in a sensible way.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Josh
>>
>>[1] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/draft-wcag-charter
>>