- From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:39:54 -0400
- To: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, wai-wcag-editor@w3.org
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEy-OxG1n0P+ngNgU0Bm9resjhTKOUWxZPU+C=dwYGX8VPWJzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Josh and WCAG Editors, Thanks, my comments are: 1. I like some of the new ideas in this version. 2. All places where it says "low vision or cognitive disabilities", please replace 'or' with 'and'. So it should read: low vision and cognitive disabilities 3. Where can we see the schedule for the updates is documented in the AG WG Project Management Plan? Thanks! Katie Haritos-Shea 703-371-5545 On Oct 10, 2016 6:00 AM, "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: > Hi Katie and all, > > Katie said: > > >I would ask again, especially of the chairs, if a regular cycle >must be > defined, why compromise, apparently, is no longer >an option in this WG any > more. Why is there no ability to >compromise between 10 and 2? on say 3, 4 > or 5 years? > > Of course there is. All of this work is about the line between our end > users requirements and the needs and wants of the group members etc. So we > are working towards a compromise/workable solution. I urge everyone to take > a breath. There is a new draft that the group will get a chance to give two > or three cents on but we have been listening, and take very seriously yours > (and others) ardent concerns. [1] > > Notice that details of timeframe etc are being moved out of the charter to > a seperate 'AG WG Project Management Plan' doc that is being worked on. > > More details to follow. > > I appreciated e'ones input on this but think it is time to find some zen > space to let this evolve in a sensible way. > > Thanks > > Josh > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/draft-wcag-charter > >
Received on Monday, 10 October 2016 11:40:27 UTC