- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 15:48:57 -0400
- To: wai-wcag-editors@w3.org
Hey, You guys do good work.
The new GL homepage is highly effective [so far as I can tell].
[I would like it better without the navbar following section heads, but
that's a small price to pay...]
In the mean time, on a matter of lesser importance, I find the chosen
RELationship of "start" on the LINK back to the WCAG at the head of the
errata to be _dis_orienting in its effect.
Source view:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
<title>Errata in Web Content Accessibility Guidelines</title>
<!-- Changed by: Ian B. Jacobs, 14-Oct-1998 -->
<LINK rel="start" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT">
<LINK rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
href="http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/base.css">
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Lynx view:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Errata in Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (p1
of 3)
#[1]start
[2]W3C
Errata in Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
This document:
[3]http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WAI-WEBCONTENT-ERRATA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Encountering a navbar entry labeled "start" I would assume it is a Jim
Thatcher style skip-navigation opportunity to a good start-reading point.
Here it takes me clean out of my current document and into the big mother
guidelines. Is this just a leftover LINK that nobody saw because it wasn't
edited in an environment where these things show?
Al
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 1999 15:42:27 UTC