- From: Hidde de Vries <hidde@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:37:21 +0100
- To: Sylvie Duchateau <sduchateau@access42.net>
- Cc: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <F08A68CF-F1EE-424D-BC67-D60DF5F1D969@w3.org>
Hi Sylvie, Thank you for filling out the survey on the ATAG Report Tool. Please find my replies below: > Is it planned that secondary audience could be people using these authoring tools that could provide feedback on their conformance to ATAG? One could imagine that the report file could then be sent to the tool developer or community for feedback. I had not planned that, but it is an interesting suggestion, I like the idea. > I also have a comment to the timeline: you talk about week 51 or week 2 but of which year? Apologies, the timeline is already out of date. It referred to week 2 of 2020. > May be consider explaining somewhere the different optionss: > - not checked, > - pass > - failed > - NOt present > - cannot tell. > In particular, not present, or not applicable? Great suggestion. We have an issue for checking the wording on the start page, I've added a comment <https://github.com/w3c/wai-atag-report-tool/issues/34#issuecomment-581911913> there to take this into account. > At last, I wonder what would be easiest: using a dropdown list or radio buttons to choose between the different options. Dropdown is what we use in the WCAG EM Report Tool <https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/report-tool/#!/>, so I feel it makes sense to use the same pattern here. Thanks again for your feedback! Best, Hidde — Web Accessibility Specialist ・ https://w3.org/people/hidde <https://w3.org/people/hidde> ・ Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2020 13:37:26 UTC