Re: [wbs] response to 'Review 2 of Evaluation Videos'

Hi Sylvie,

Many thanks for your quick response! Comments inline below:


On 06/12/2019 11:33, Sylvie Duchateau via WBS Mailer wrote:
>> Video 4: Comprehensive Evaluation (2nd Draft)
>>
>>      
[SNIP]
>>
>>
> Comments:
> I cannot find the script of the video for now, but I noticed one
> incoherence in the spoken text.

Here is the script:
  - 
https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Video-Based_Resources/Evaluation_Introduction#Video_4:_Comprehensive_Evaluation_.28.7E2_minutes.29


> I understand the beginning, that explains what a conformance review is,
> then what you need to do effective comprehensive evaluation review :
> "- expertise in accessibility standards,

Not really. It says "To do effective conformance evaluation, you need 
expertise in:" -- maybe bad voice-over intonation?


> - accessible web design and develompent,
> - assistive technologies
> and in how people with disabilities use the web".
> This does not make sense for me. May be how people with disabilities use
> the can help you for that.
> Is somehting missing?

No. To do effective conformance evaluation, you need expertise in ... 
how people with disabilities use the Web. Wonder where the confusion 
occurred and how to improve it.


>> Video 5: Involving Users (2nd Draft)
>>
>>
[SNIP]
>>
>>
> Comments:
> It was difficult to concentrate on this video as I only rely on sound, not
> visual, as the music is bit too loud in comparison with the narration. But
> I know that this will be changed in the next version. So it is not a cruial
> comment.

Sorry about that. Yes, the music and volume corrections are not done.


Many thanks,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Friday, 6 December 2019 10:46:52 UTC