- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:55:34 +0100
- To: hkramer@colorado.edu
- Cc: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Hi Howard, Thank you again for your review and comments. We've made several changes to script #5 to make it more clear. Could you please review it again, and check if your concerns are addressed? - http://w3c.github.io/wai-showcase-examples/script5.html Many thanks, Shadi On 25.2.2016 10:36, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Hi Howard, > > Thank you for your review and comments! > > I opened an issue regarding your concerns with Script #5: > - https://github.com/w3c/wai-showcase-examples/issues/114 > > Could you please respond in Github or by replying to this email on your > specific concerns? Suggestions for improvement would be really helpful. > > Thanks, > Shadi > > > On 25.2.2016 03:45, Howard Kramer via WBS Mailer wrote: >> The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Showcase >> Video, >> final script approval: Scripts 1 - 5' (Education and Outreach Working >> Group) >> for Howard Kramer. >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> About this survey >>> ---- >>> This survey is for EOWG review and approval of the first *five* scripts >>> for Showcase Examples with Videos. We have completed two rounds of >>> review, made edits based on your comments and would appreciate your >>> final approval. >>> >>> Please consider our time constraints and only offer objections if they >>> are relevant and strong ones. >>> Questions to consider include: >>> * Have your previous comments been sufficiently addressed? >>> * Do have any strong objections to the revised scripts? >>> * Are we OK to move the scripts into production? >>> >>> >> >> I really liked 1 - 4 and had no suggestions for changes. It's hard to >> judge >> 5 without seeing what specifically will be shown on the screen. It didn't >> seem as clear as the first 4. >> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 1: Video Captions >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 1: Video Captions and add any comments in GitHub as >>> new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >> >> * (x) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> * ( ) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have >> commented in >> GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 2: Color Contrast >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 2: Color Contrast and add any comments in GitHub as >>> new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >> >> * (x) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> * ( ) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> >> >> >> >> * ( ) I have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have commented in >> GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 3: Voice Recognition >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 3: Voice Recognition and add any comments in GitHub >>> as new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >> >> * (x) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> >> >> * ( ) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> >> * ( ) I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have >> commented in >> GitHub or below. >> >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 4: Text to Speech >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 4: Text to Speech and add any comments in GitHub as >>> new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >> >> * (x) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> * ( ) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have >> commented in >> GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 5: Layout and Design >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 5: Layout and Design and add any comments in GitHub >>> as new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >> >> * ( ) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> >> >> >> * (x) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have >> commented in >> GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> As mentioned above, I didn't find this script as effective. I think from >> shot 4 on it's a little confusing - relying a lot on facial >> expressions it >> seems. >> >>> >>> These answers were last modified on 25 February 2016 at 02:43:15 U.T.C. >>> by Howard Kramer >>> >> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/showcase2/ until 2016-02-25. >> >> Regards, >> >> The Automatic WBS Mailer >> >> > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, WAI International Program Office W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:55:53 UTC