- From: Andrew Arch <andrew.arch@digital.gov.au>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:16:28 +1100
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALrq49b57=cHt6j4ewQQ_6TNEPOtCAnoqog=GQ5qSThFyFuBcg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Shadi and all, Yes - OK. Both times I thought I said "or be sure to include this on the related web page" as the out to make sure the points are included in the additional info if the videos can't accommodate - and I agree that they are going to be very dense already!! Excellent work overall - looking forward to seeing them come to life :) Andrew ------------------- Andrew Arch Accessibility / Inclusivity / Assisted Digital Digital Transformation Office <http://www.dto.gov.au/> p. 0428 134 529 e. andrew.arch@digital.gov.au t. @AusDTO <https://twitter.com/AusDTO> | @amja <https://twitter.com/amja> On 26 February 2016 at 19:44, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for completing the survey. I added your comments in Github: > - https://github.com/w3c/wai-showcase-examples/issues/115 > - https://github.com/w3c/wai-showcase-examples/issues/116 > > Could you respond there or by replying to this email? Basically my > question for both of your comments is: > > [[ > Would it be OK to look at these mentions on the web page that contains the > videos (and to which the videos link to at the end) instead of in the > videos themselves? The video is already very dense and adding more to it at > this stage will be difficult. > ]] > > Many thanks, > Shadi > > > On 26.2.2016 01:36, Andrew Arch via WBS Mailer wrote: > >> The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Showcase Video, >> final script approval: Scripts 1 - 5' (Education and Outreach Working >> Group) >> for Andrew Arch. >> >> >>> --------------------------------- >>> About this survey >>> ---- >>> This survey is for EOWG review and approval of the first *five* scripts >>> for Showcase Examples with Videos. We have completed two rounds of >>> review, made edits based on your comments and would appreciate your >>> final approval. >>> >>> Please consider our time constraints and only offer objections if they >>> are relevant and strong ones. >>> Questions to consider include: >>> * Have your previous comments been sufficiently addressed? >>> * Do have any strong objections to the revised scripts? >>> * Are we OK to move the scripts into production? >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 1: Video Captions >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 1: Video Captions and add any comments in GitHub as >>> new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >>> >> * ( ) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> * (x) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have commented >> in >> GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> Mention the other benefits captions - feeds into (or can be drawn from) a >> transcript which is discoverable and searchable. [or be sure to include >> this on the related web page] >> >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 2: Color Contrast >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 2: Color Contrast and add any comments in GitHub as >>> new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >>> >> * (x) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> * ( ) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> >> >> >> >> * ( ) I have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have commented in >> GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> >> >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 3: Voice Recognition >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 3: Voice Recognition and add any comments in GitHub >>> as new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >>> >> * (x) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> >> >> * ( ) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> >> * ( ) I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have commented >> in >> GitHub or below. >> >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> >> >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 4: Text to Speech >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 4: Text to Speech and add any comments in GitHub as >>> new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >>> >> * ( ) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> * (x) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have commented >> in >> GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> maybe mention different learning style (learning disabilities) and/or that >> we learn better when we take stuff in through multiple modes [or be sure >> to >> mention on associated web page] >> >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Script 5: Layout and Design >>> ---- >>> Please review Script 5: Layout and Design and add any comments in GitHub >>> as new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, >>> please add your comments below. >>> (If it helps your review: diff-markup of changes to the 12 February.) >>> >>> >> * (x) I reviewed it and have no objections - produce it! >> >> >> >> * ( ) I am pretty happy with the revised script but suggest you to >> consider my comment (at the discretion of the Task Force). Suggestion >> only, >> not a show stopper - in GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I do have a *strong* (showstopping) objection and have commented >> in >> GitHub or below. >> * ( ) I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and >> accept the decisions of the Group. >> >> >> >> >>> These answers were last modified on 26 February 2016 at 00:34:49 U.T.C. >>> by Andrew Arch >>> >>> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/showcase2/ until 2016-02-25. >> >> Regards, >> >> The Automatic WBS Mailer >> >> >> > -- > Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ > Activity Lead, WAI International Program Office > W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) >
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2016 00:16:59 UTC