Re: Requirements Analysis for resource management

Thanks Shawn. That works.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Susan,
>
> It depends. :-)
>
> Generally I think they should be treated as updating existing work, not
> totally new projects.
>
> Many resources already have a Requirements Analysis (RA), so we might just
> be making tweaks or adding a section for the update.
>
> The Mobile Accessibility page doesn't yet have a RA, and I think it would
> be good to do one for it overall. Again -- can be just brief bullet points
> - nothing fancy or polished - it's an internal doc.
>
> ~Shawn
>
>
> On 7/11/2016 7:48 PM, Susan Hewitt wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> For the resources we're updating/editing, should a RA document reflect
>> the resource as a whole or our goal for the update? I'm not sure if we're
>> treating these updates as a separate projects or part of the ongoing work
>> on the resources.
>>
>> Thx
>> S
>>
>> --
>> susan hewitt
>> senior accessibility specialist
>> deque systems
>>
>>


-- 
susan hewitt
senior accessibility specialist
deque systems