- From: Kevin White <kevin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:55:00 +0100
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Hi Shadi, I saw that thanks. Are you happy if I pick this up with Shawn first to decide approach to discussion? Thanks Kevin > On 16 Jul 2015, at 10:21, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > > I put something to start toying with on GitHub for discussion. > > Best, > Shadi > > > On 16.7.2015 10:29, Kevin White wrote: >> Hi Shadi, >> >> I don’t disagree but I am concerned about how much framing is feasible. I am guessing this relates to your suggestion of adding in something to reinforce the 'getting started' message. I honestly don’t know how much difference that would make as it is already in the primary nav, section nav, and main landing page. >> >> Not averse to trying something to improve this though >> >> Kevin >> >>> On 16 Jul 2015, at 08:10, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 14.7.2015 20:51, Mark Weiler wrote: >>>> A concern I have ... are there plans for it to scale? I've gone through WCAG 2.0 and found it has hundreds of general/html/css/aria/etc. techniques to integrate accessibility and meet the WCAG criteria. >>> >>> FWIW, this comment reinforces my feeling that it is not sufficiently clear that these are only start-up resources that cover only a small sub-set of the requirements. People (including some EO participants) seem to expect more because the resources are not properly framed. >>> >>> Best, >>> Shadi >>> >>> -- >>> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ >>> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office >>> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) >>> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) >>> >> >> > > -- > Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ > Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office > Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) > Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) >
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2015 10:55:08 UTC