- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:21:18 +0200
- To: Kevin White <kevin@w3.org>
- CC: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
I put something to start toying with on GitHub for discussion. Best, Shadi On 16.7.2015 10:29, Kevin White wrote: > Hi Shadi, > > I don’t disagree but I am concerned about how much framing is feasible. I am guessing this relates to your suggestion of adding in something to reinforce the 'getting started' message. I honestly don’t know how much difference that would make as it is already in the primary nav, section nav, and main landing page. > > Not averse to trying something to improve this though > > Kevin > >> On 16 Jul 2015, at 08:10, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: >> >> On 14.7.2015 20:51, Mark Weiler wrote: >>> A concern I have ... are there plans for it to scale? I've gone through WCAG 2.0 and found it has hundreds of general/html/css/aria/etc. techniques to integrate accessibility and meet the WCAG criteria. >> >> FWIW, this comment reinforces my feeling that it is not sufficiently clear that these are only start-up resources that cover only a small sub-set of the requirements. People (including some EO participants) seem to expect more because the resources are not properly framed. >> >> Best, >> Shadi >> >> -- >> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ >> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office >> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) >> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) >> > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2015 09:21:35 UTC