- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:24:18 -0600
- To: melody.yy.ma@gmail.com, ee@w3.org, wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
- CC: shadi@w3.org
Hi Melody, Thanks for commenting right away! That is just a short handle and the full explanation says: "_Tables with two headers_ have headers for rows and columns:" I agree that's not clear. What about if we edited it to something like: "_Tables with two headers_ have a row header and a column header:" (or even "_Tables with two headers_ have one row header and one column header:") (or even "_Tables with two headers_ have a simple row header and a simple column header:") If so, would you put that in the survey? If not, would you please suggest other solutions in the survey? (We're trying to finalize it this week if we can. :-) Thanks, ~Shawn On 2/25/2015 2:06 PM, Melody Ma via WBS Mailer wrote: > The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'EOWG Weekly > Survey - 23 February 2015' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for Melody > Ma. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Tables Tutorial page titles >> ---- >> Some people were still uncomfortable with using arbitrary table type >> categories as Tutorial page titles. A new proposal from the co-editors >> for more clear page titles is now available in the draft at: Tables >> Tutorial >> Latest draft: >> * Tables with one header >> * Tables with two headers >> * Tables with irregular headers >> * Tables with multi-level headers >> Previous drafts were:Basic Tables, Multi-directional Tables, Irregular >> Tables, Multi-level Tables.Simple Tables, Regular Tables, Irregular >> Tables, Multi-level Tables. >> How does this work? >> > > * ( ) I'm comfortable with the Latest draft titles (listed above). > * (x) I object to these. > * ( ) Other. > > Comments: > I'm fine with everything accept for "Tables with two headers", because this > is actually a row and column as header, not two rows or two columns as > headers. > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> [this question will be ready on Thursday] Tables Tutorial changes >> ---- >> As soon as we resolve the page title issue above (hopefully this week), >> the Tables Tutorial will be ready to publish! The links below list >> changes made based on feedback from the recent approval-to-publish >> survey. >> * (to be updated on Thursday) Tables Tutorial Changes since survey >> >> > > * ( ) I'm OK with the changes and approve publication. > * ( ) I approve publication (even though I didn't have a chance to review > the changes in detail). > * (x) I approve publication; however, I suggest additional changes in the > Comments section below - for editors' discretion. > > * ( ) I will approve publication only after the comments in the Comments > section below are addressed. > * ( ) I abstain. > Comments: > I provided comments in the last Tutorial survey and on github. > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> [this question will be ready on Thursday] WCAG-EM Report Tool changes >> ---- >> As soon as we decide on Version 1.0/Beta (on Friday's teleconference), >> the WCAG-EM Report Tool will be ready to publish! The link below lists a >> few minor changes made based on feedback from the recent >> approval-to-publish survey. >> * (to be updated on Thursday) WCAG-EM Report Tool Changes since survey >> >> > > * (x) I'm OK with the changes and approve publication. > * ( ) I approve publication (even though I didn't have a chance to review > the changes in detail). > * ( ) I approve publication; however, I suggest additional changes in the > Comments section below - for editors' discretion. > > * ( ) I will approve publication only after the comments in the Comments > section below are addressed. > * ( ) I abstain. > Comments: > > >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Images and Forms Tutorial changes >> ---- >> The Images and Forms Tutorials are ready to publish! The links below list >> changes made based on feedback from the recent approval-to-publish >> survey. >> * Images Tutorial Changes since survey >> * Forms Tutorial changes since survey >> >> > > * (x) I'm OK with the changes and approve publication. > * ( ) I approve publication (even though I didn't have a chance to review > all the changes in detail). > * ( ) I approve publication; however, I suggest additional changes in the > Comments section below - for editors' discretion. > > * ( ) I will approve publication only after the comments in the Comments > section below are addressed. > * ( ) I abstain. > Comments: > > >> >> These answers were last modified on 25 February 2015 at 20:05:33 U.T.C. >> by Melody Ma >> > Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/EOWG23Feb15/ until 2015-02-27. > > Regards, > > The Automatic WBS Mailer > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2015 20:24:28 UTC