- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:32:57 -0500
- To: Peter Thiessen <thiessenp@acm.org>, Victoria Menezes Miller <menezesmiller@conceptivity.ch>
- CC: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Thanks, Peter! These were written before MWABP. It would be great if we could integrate MWABP some. Do you have specific suggestions on points in MWABP that would fit in <http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences>? For example, how would we address 3.5.3 Design for Multiple Interaction Methods ? ~Shawn On 8/11/2012 3:51 PM, Peter Thiessen wrote: > Hi Vicki, > > I didn't have access to that WIKI page > (http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Mobile_pages) so I thought I'd just > email my comments over, especially since they're only minor. My > comments may need to be elaborated - just let me know if so. > > > 1. http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/ > An accurate overview of summarizing the benefit of combining both WCAG > & MWBP into the design process. I don't have much to say really. > > In the intro the term developer is used. From my experience, this sort > of wording can be suriprisingly impactful in scaring off > non-developers. A designer might read the word "developer" and then > run away screaming. Just my two cents. > > Perhaps this bit about "the process more efficient" could be expanded. > It may be benefical to emphasise the high cost of putting off > following either WCAG/MWBP until later in a project's life cycle. A > developer/project planner might read the brief explanation as "Great, > I'll follow one now and do the other later, since they overlap > anyways..". I can elaborate if need be. But then again, perhaps for an > overview this amount of information is perfect. > > > 2. http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences > Looks good. My only comment is about the focus on content. I realise > content is the focus here but designers/developers may think the > principles provided only apply to Web sites and not to Web > applications. Explicitly emphasizing that both content and > UI/application are covered may help increase the relevancy of this > page, especially with developers. > > It's a shame the MWABP (http://www.w3.org/TR/mwabp/) mainly only > covers different forms of caching techniques (bandwidth/memory/..), or > it would be great to put along side MWBP as reference on certain > crosover points - especially in the Operable section. > (Well OK there is one crossover point .. "3.5.3 Design for Multiple > Interaction Methods" :-) > > > cheers, > +peter > ...[snip]
Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 13:33:10 UTC