- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:51:07 -0500
- To: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
[attachments were too large for this list. they are at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2011Jul/0017.html] Hi Shadi, This resource is looking awesome! With a few changes, I support publishing it as a Draft for public review. I also have many minor edit suggestions, most of which are copyedit-level comments. One page I think needs more significant editing, but I think those can wait for the next round after the public review. * Overview page <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/2009/Overview> Comments attached to e-mail archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-eo-editors/2011Apr/0012.html * Stories of Web Users <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/2009/stories> Some issues are in the e-mail archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-eo-editors/2011Apr/0013.html which we addressed in the EOWG telecon minuted at http://www.w3.org/2011/04/08-eo-minutes Attached file has additional comments. * Diversity of Web Users <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/2009/diversity> Attached file has comments. * Diversity in Web Use <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/2009/browsing> This page I think needs more work. It's too complicated and hard to follow. I wonder about simplifying it and not trying to include so much information? Or, integrating the information in the Diversity of Web Users page, now that we have the expand-collapse functionality? However, I don't think that should hold up publication of the entire resource suite as a Draft. I look forward to talking through ideas and options. (My edit suggestions were very significant and I didn't finish on paper or type up the ones I had. I think need to look at a higher level at what to do with this page.) * Accessibility Principles <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/2009/principles> I think this page could become a key page that we point to as an introduction to web accessibility standards, especially WCAG 2. Because of its potential, I think it is worth polishing even more than the other pages. Attached file has comments. Thanks for all your hard work on this! It is really coming together. Best, ~Shawn
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 13:51:15 UTC