- From: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:11:10 -0500
- To: wai-eo-editors@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20090619165002.E63105843C@prnetwtsv020.primusnetworks.com>
Some follow up comments to this morning's discussion of <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/responding/>How to Report Inaccessible Websites 1. While the group appreciates the directness of "complaining" and "complain" watch for repetitive use within short paragraph of span of sentences. 2. Second sentence, second paragraph of "Approach" section Change: Approaching an organization with an angry, aggressive tone will usually reflect badly on you and the accessibility cause, and not result in a good response. To: Approaching an organization with an angry, aggressive tone will usually reflect badly on you and the accessibility cause. As a result, you may not get the best outcome. 3. In "Why Bother" section Change: Your effort in taking the time to contact an organization that has an inaccessible website may turn out to have an impact and result in improvement that will benefit many others. To: Your effort in taking the time to contact an organization that has an inaccessible website may have an impact and result in improvement that will benefit many others. 4. Also in "Why Bother" section Reconsider "front-of-mind" Reconsider "And, as we said earlier..." if previously said, why repeated? Thanks for considering, Sharron
Received on Friday, 19 June 2009 17:11:48 UTC