- From: Yeliz Yesilada <yesilady@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:00:36 +0200
- To: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
- Cc: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org>, Helle Bjarnø <hbj@visinfo.dk>, Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>, Sylvie Duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>, William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>, Liam McGee <liam.mcgee@communis.co.uk>, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>, Doyle Saylor <saylordj@WellsFargo.COM>, Jennifer Sutton <jsuttondc@gmail.com>, "Welsh, Jack R" <jack.r.welsh@boeing.com>
On 16 Dec 2009, at 07:10, Shawn Henry wrote: > If you have time, please also send thoughts on: > * do we want to add a top level navigation category or not? I think a top level navigation for these documents is definitely a good idea. Currently, they are together with other documents, and it would be difficult for users to find them > * if yes, which documents should go in the new category? I think the current list looks good, I am just not sure about <http:// www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-accessibility-n-usability.html> as this could be too technical for an end user. > * if yes, what should it be called? if you were an "average" > "user", what would words in the navigation would lead you to select > them thinking that there was material there for you? Difficult to predict, I guess we need to ask this directly to some users. How about these? "For Web users" "For users" "Accessibility for you" "Your accessibility" "My accessibility" "My accessibility needs" Regards, Yeliz.
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2009 12:04:13 UTC