Re: Feedback to Shared Web Experiences

Thank you, Alex, for taking the time to review these documents. We'll address your comments.

One question below:

>   In the "Shared Web Experiences" document, is the detailed information 
> clear yet succinct?
> o    A number of WCAG 2 success criteria are missing from the document.  
> I assume that is due to the incomplete status of the document.

Actually, this is a complete version of the document.<> However, it is meant to provide some strong *examples* of barriers to interacting with Web content experienced by people with disabilities and people using mobile devices, and the overlap between WCAG and MWBP. It is not meant to be a comprehensive list of all SC.

(The comprehensive list should be provided in <> and will be provided in <>.)

Please let us know if there are some WCAG 2.0 success criteria that are missing that apply to the examples that are already there. Also, please let us know if there are some additional examples that would be clear and strong.

>   Are there other examples that we might want to include in the "Shared 
> Web Experiences" document?
> o    I think it would unhelpful to cover all possible scenarios here.  
> Use the best case forward is fine.  It would also cut down the length of 
> document as well.

Yes, agree to include strong examples, not every case.


Shawn Lawton Henry, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
phone: +1-617-395-7664

Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 12:59:36 UTC