- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of wed@csulb.edu <webmaster@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:40:01 +0000
- To: wai-eo-editors@w3.org
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'EOWG Call for Review: WCAG 2.0 Presentation 1' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for Wayne Dick. --------------------------------- Version ---- Which version are these comments for? The version date is on Slide 2. * (x) 27 August 2007 --------------------------------- Community or Public ---- First, a relatively easy question:The presentation talks about "Community|Public review, comments, and feedback..." and "Providing adequate time for community|public review," on Slide 8, Slide 9 Notes, and Slide 11 Notes. Do you prefer "community" or "public" for these? Use the comment field for any explanations. * ( ) Prefer community * (x) Prefer public * ( ) No preference Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): Public is more open and serious. --------------------------------- Example of WCAG 2.0 providing more design flexibility ---- Slide 28 has the following examples of how WCAG 2.0 provides more flexibility for design: * WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 7.1: Until user agents allow users to control flickering, avoid causing the screen to flicker. [Priority 1]WCAG 2.0 allows more movement within defined parameters * WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 13.6: Group related links, identify the group (for user agents), and, until user agents do so, provide a way to bypass the group. [Priority 3]WCAG 2.0 allows more flexibility in meeting the corresponding success criteria: Bypass Blocks: A mechanism is available to bypass blocks of content that are repeated on multiple Web pages Are these good examples? Are they clear and strong? Please rate each from the drop-down list. What would be another clear, strong example? Please put it in the Comments field. * Checkpoint 7.1 -- WCAG 2.0 allows more movement: [ 5 +++++ (highest) ] * Checkpoint 13.6 -- WCAG 2.0 lists more techniques : [ 5 +++++ (highest) ] Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): --------------------------------- Example of WCAG 1.0 user agent clause that's no longer an issue ---- For Slide 35 we want to give an example or two of things that were required in WCAG 1.0 that are no longer issues due to developments in technologies. Ideas: * 1.5 Until user agents render text equivalents for client-side image map links, provide redundant text links for each active region of a client-side image map. * 10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly, include default, place-holding characters in edit boxes and text areas. * 10.5 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render adjacent links distinctly, include non-link, printable characters (surrounded by spaces) between adjacent links. Are these good examples? Are they clear and strong? Please rate each from the drop-down list. What would be another clear, strong example? Please put it in the Comments field. * 1.5 Until user agents render text equivalents for client-side image map links...: [ 4 ++++ ] * 10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly...: [ 5 +++++ (highest) ] * 10.5 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render adjacent links distinctly...: [ 5 +++++ (highest) ] Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): --------------------------------- Acceptance of WCAG 2.0 Presentation Directive Overview ---- Based on the current version, please answer below. Note that you can change your answer; for example, if there are edits later. * (x) I accept this version of the document as is * ( ) I accept this version of the document, and suggest changes below * ( ) I accept this version of the document only if the changes below are implemented * ( ) I do not accept this version of the document because of the comments below * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Comments ---- Comments on the document, formatted as described above. Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): Some slides, like the ones with comparisons of 1.0 with 2.0 specifics are visually cluttered, I would split them some. These answers were last modified on 31 August 2007 at 12:34:35 U.T.C. by Wayne Dick Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/wcag20pres-easy1/ until 2007-09-05. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 12:40:09 UTC