Re: [wbs] Andrew Arch response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September'

Hi Andrew,


WBS Mailer on behalf of <andrew.arch@nils.org.au> wrote:
> Comments sent recently to EO-Editors list for editors discretion.

Thank you for filling out the survey form!

I believe all your comments should have been addressed and recorded in the changelog of each document. Most of the suggestions were incorporated except for two comments that were recorded into the "Conformance Evaluation" changelog [1] for future updates to the actual content (which we plan to do in 2006). Please let me know if you feel that your comments have not been adequately addressed or confirm that they have been resolved.

Regards,
  Shadi
[1] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/conformance-changelog.html>


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra,     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
Chair and Team Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),           http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
WAI-TIES Project,                 http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,     http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles -- 06560, Sophia-Antipolis -- France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64           Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 

Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 22:38:12 UTC