[wbs] Pasquale Popolizio response to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation Resource Suite, 2005 September'

Here are the answers submitted to 'EOWG Call for Review: Evaluation
Resource Suite, 2005 September' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for
Pasquale Popolizio.



---------------------------------
Support for the 4 re-organized pages
----
I:



 * ( ) accept the 4 re-organized pages as is
 * (x) accept the 4 re-organized pages, suggest changes below
 * ( ) accept the 4 re-organized pages only with the changes below
 * ( ) do not accept the 4 re-organized pages because of the comments
below
 * ( ) abstain (not vote)





---------------------------------
Support for Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools (new page)
----
I:



 * (x) accept the Selecting Tools page as is
 * ( ) accept the Selecting Tools page, suggest changes below
 * ( ) accept the Selecting Tools page only with the changes below
 * ( ) do not accept the Selecting Tools page because of the comments
below
 * ( ) abstain (not vote)





---------------------------------
Overview page
----


Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
It' ok!




---------------------------------
Preliminary Review page
----


Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
* priority: [editor's discretion]
* location: second paragraph, first list item
* current wording: "Include all pages on which people are more likely to
enter your site ("welcome page" etc.)."
* suggested revision: "Include all pages on which people are more likely
to enter your site ("welcome page", etc.)."
* rationale: comma after "welcome page"


* priority: [required in this version]
* location: third paragraph, first sentence
* current wording: "Use a graphical user interface (GUI) browser (such as
FireFox, ..."
* suggested revision: "Use a graphical user interface (GUI) browser (such
as Firefox, "
* rationale: Firefox and not FireFox


* priority: [editor's discretion]
* location: third paragraph, #6 list item
* current wording: "Without using the mouse, use the keyboard to "tab"
through the links and form controls on a page, ..."
* suggested revision: "Without using the mouse, use the keyboard to
navigate by tab through the links and form controls on a page, "


* priority: [required in this version]
* location: third paragraph, second sentence
* current wording: "WAVE Toolbar for FireFox, ... Web Developer Extension
for FireFox).."
* suggested revision: "WAVE Toolbar for Firefox, ... Web Developer
Extension for Firefox).."
* rationale: Firefox and not FireFox




---------------------------------
Conformance Evaluation page
----


Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
* priority: [required in this version]
* location: second paragraph, first sentence
* current wording: "Note: disclosure should be internal to the
organization during evaluation; if conformance is claimed publicly,
disclose externally (e.g. on the Web site)."
* suggested revision: "Note: disclosure should be internal to the
organization during evaluation; if conformance is claimed publicly,
disclose externally (for example, on the Web site)...."
* rationale: "for example," and not "e.g."


* priority: [editor's discretion]
* location: second paragraph, second list item
* current wording: "Include all pages on which people are more likely to
enter your site ("welcome page" etc.)"
* suggested revision: "Include all pages on which people are more likely
to enter your site ("welcome page", etc.)"
* rationale: comma after "welcome page"


* priority: [required in this version]
* location: second paragraph, second list item
* current wording: "Note: there are special considerations for web sites
with database driven dynamically generated web content."
* suggested revision: "Note: there are special considerations for Web
sites with database driven dynamically generated Web content."
* rationale: "Web" and not "web"


* priority: [required in this version]
* location: second paragraph, third list item
* current wording: "Note: if testing of the entire site is not feasible
(e.g. because of its unusual size or dynamic nature)..."
* suggested revision: "Note: if testing of the entire site is not feasible
(for example, because of its unusual size or dynamic nature)..."
* rationale: "for example," and not "e.g."


* priority: [required in this version]
* location: fourth paragraph
* current wording: "...(e.g. if site contains no audio content, skip
those);..."
* suggested revision: "...(for example, if site contains no audio content,
skip those);..."
* rationale: "for example," and not "e.g."


* priority: [required in this version]
* location: paragraph "Examine pages using graphical browsers", first
sentence
* current wording: "(such as Internet Explorer, Mozilla FireFox, Netscape
Navigator, Opera, Safari, or others),.."
* suggested revision: "(such as Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox,
Netscape Navigator, Opera, Safari, or others),.."
* rationale: Firefox and not FireFox


* priority: [editor's discretion]
* location:  paragraph "Examine pages using graphical browsers", #7 list
item
* current wording: "ithout using the mouse, use the keyboard to "tab"
through the links ..."
* suggested revision: "ithout using the mouse, use the keyboard to
navigate by tab through the links... "


* priority: [required in this version]
* location: paragraph "Examine pages using graphical browsers", last
sentence
* current wording: "Note: Browser extensions and other plug-in evaluation
tools (such as AIS Toolbar for Internet Explorer, WAVE Toolbar for
FireFox,.."
* suggested revision: "Note: Browser extensions and other plug-in
evaluation tools (such as AIS Toolbar for Internet Explorer, WAVE Toolbar
for Firefox,.."
* rationale: Firefox and not FireFox


* priority: [required in this version]
* location:  paragraph "Examine pages using specialized browsers"
* current wording: "Is equivalent information and function (e.g. links and
scripted events)..."
* suggested revision: "Is equivalent information and function (for
example, links and scripted events)..."
* rationale: "for example," and not "e.g."




---------------------------------
Specific Contexts page
----


Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
* priority: [required in this version]
* location:  paragraph "Evaluation of dynamically generated Web pages",
"Templates"
* current wording: "Note: if templates are generated by authoring software
evaluate the capability of the authoring tool to include accessible
features (see Authoring Tools Accessibility Guidelines Overview), e.g.:"
* suggested revision: "Note: if templates are generated by authoring
software evaluate the capability of the authoring tool to include
accessible features (see Authoring Tools Accessibility Guidelines
Overview), for example:"
* rationale: "for example" and not "e.g."


* priority: [required in this version]
* location:  paragraph "Evaluation of dynamically generated Web pages",
"Content", second list item
* current wording: "Do generated data tables have accessibility aids (e.g
captions, id on th header cells, etc.)?"
* suggested revision: "Do generated data tables have accessibility aids
(for example, captions, id on th header cells, etc.)?"
* rationale: "for example" and not "e.g."




---------------------------------
Selecting Tools page
----


Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
It's ok!




---------------------------------
General comments on the resource suite as a whole
----


Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
Great work!
Only a suggestion: in navigation menu, two items are "Preliminary
Reviews", "Conformance Evaluations". Maybe we can change to "Preliminary
Review", "Conformance Evaluation", like the page title.

Regards
ciao

pasquale


These answers were last modified on 14 September 2005 at 15:51:32 E.S.T.
by Pasquale Popolizio

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/eval-2005sept/ until 2005-09-15.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 15:55:07 UTC