Re: sellability of D-link vs. LONGDESC

I agree with Daniel. The true educational value here is to instruct the
short description and encourage the use of longdesc where appropriate. 

- Mike



At 05:25 PM 9/15/97 +0200, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
>
>Phill Jenkins wrote:
>> I believe that both the ALT= and LONGDESC= (or it's equivalent) need
>> NOT be "sold" to content authors, but sold to the HTML group as
>> "required".  If these attributes are missing, the HTML should be
>> considered incorrect and not to spec.
>
>I'm not sure LONGDESC, if retained, should be marked as required, most
>images are probably fine with a short description only.
>
>
>

-------------------------
Michael G. Paciello                      Executive Director, 
E-Mail: mailto:paciello@yuri.org         Yuri Rubinsky Insight Foundation
Tel: +1 603 598 9544                     URL: http://www.yuri.org/
FAX: +1 603 598 2839                     Promoting Accessibility Awareness!

Please Make a Tax-Deductible Donation:   http://www.yuri.org/donate.html

Received on Monday, 15 September 1997 11:45:39 UTC