- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 17:26:19 -0400 (EDT)
- To: dsr@w3.org (Dave Raggett)
- Cc: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU, w3c-wai-wg@w3.org
to follow up on what Dave Raggett said: > > Maybe for now its best to just reserve a term for linking > abbreviation dictionaries. > It is better to reserve a keyword or expression (pattern of keywords) for linking [all kinds of] dictionaries and let the dictionary itself declare its domain of applicability to be expanding abbreviations. All dictionaries are collections of entries. Each entry binds one short text to one or more longer texts. The application of these relationships [dictionary entries] should be up to the dictionary and the application that applies them against the document. Not special codes in the document itself. At one use of a word one might want to encode the equivalent of for <definition> use <Webster_document> select <sense #3>. But references to dictionaries in the document should simply add the dictionary to the context without specializing the notion of "dictionary". -- Al Gilman
Received on Saturday, 2 August 1997 17:26:27 UTC