- From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocadu.ca>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 13:23:28 +0000
- To: "kim@redstartsystems.com" <kim@redstartsystems.com>, "User Agent Working Group" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 13:23:57 UTC
Hi Kim, I agree that the stems are inconsistent but I'm not sure about adding verbs (provide, allow, make, etc.) all over the place. And it seems like you're not sure either... e.g., you leave GL1.5 alone. I wonder if a better style rule might be noun phrases unless there is unacceptable ambiguity. This is what ATAG 2.0 does and also seems to be what WCAG did (e.g. "Turn-off" and "Extend" under 2.2.1.). -Jan From: Kim Patch [mailto:kim@redstartsystems.com] Sent: September-03-13 2:58 PM To: User Agent Working Group Subject: Stem consistency proposals A spreadsheet is attached with proposed title changes to SC titles to make them clear, consistent within each section, and to make sure every title is from the user agent point of view. Cheers, Kim -- ___________________________________________________ Kimberly Patch President Redstart Systems, Inc. (617) 325-3966 kim@redstartsystems.com<mailto:kim@redstartsystems.com> www.redstartsystems.com<http://www.redstartsystems.com> - making speech fly Blog: Patch on Speech +Kim Patch Twitter: RedstartSystems www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch<http://www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch> ___________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 13:23:57 UTC