- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:02:43 -0500
- To: WAI-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1Wk+eC+Z-ObiQ5uheA=NYo95sb2fruTDyAs5yxtXz0SGTA@mail.gmail.com>
5.1.2 OCAD 48
this seems a comment requiring no action.
agree that it is central to everything.
perhaps make it 5.1.1
?? how are 4.1.1 different from 5.1.3
4.1.1 Platform Accessibility Services:
The user agent supports relevant platform
accessibility services. (Level A)
5.1.3 Implement Accessibility Features of
platform: If the user agent contains
non-web-based user interfaces, then those
user interfaces follow user interface
accessibility guidelines for the
platform. (Level A)
4.1.6 OCAD46
proposal not accepted. 416 items are
related to onscreen text.
412 are related to user interface
components that have a name, role, state.
4.1.5 OCAD45
This is unrelated to ARIA. it is only to
allow AT to write to the interface the
same way a user can when using a mouse or
keyboard.
3.4.1 OCAD43 This seems like the superset
(and so the possible replacement) of
1.8.9 and 2.1.4.
agree that 3.4.1 is the more general case
that includes 1.8.9 (189 should be
removed) and is only about focus changes.
except 189 allows configurationa??
2.1.4 is about change in state of
selection for radio buttons and
checkboxes when an item receives focus.
this is different than moving focus in an
unpredictable manner. 2.1.4 should remain
as is.
2.11.8 OCAD39
2.11.8 is covered by 1.1.1 and is an
implementation detail. remove 2.11.8
add example to 1.1.1
Betty, has an auditory processing
problem. she is watching a movie that has
several caption and audio tracks . She
pulls up a menu to determine which is
available she switches between audio
tracks until she find one she can
understand. She also reinforces the audio
by selecting a caption track.
2.10.1 & 2.10.2 OCAD34 & OCAD35
three flash threshold in UI and content.
Agree that detecting flashes in content
will be very difficult. <blink> is an
edge case.
remove 2.10.1 and promote 2.10.2 to A (UI
should not be doing this anyway, no
browser does this so easy check), and
change wording of 2.10.2 to :
2.10.2 Three Flashes: In its default
configuration, the user agent does not
display any user interface componentsthat
flashes more than three times in any
one-second period (regardless of whether
not the flash is below the general flash
and red flash thresholds). (Level A)
[removed 'or recognized content' and
changed level from AAA to A]
or keep 2.10.2 at AAA but still change
wording. and keep 2.10.1 but change
wording to
2.10.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold:
In its default configuration, the user
agent does not display any user interface
components that flashes more than three
times in any one-second period, unless
the flash is below general flash and red
flash thresholds. (Level A) [removed "or
recognized content"]
OCAD33 2.9.2 time independent, wrong
location.
Agree, this is not about time
independence. the download monitor is
informing the user of what is happening.
seems better in Understandable (GL4).
however,
Every browser does this. informing the
user about downloading status is basic
usability; as long as the download
monitor is programatically accessible and
its messaging is accessible as per our
other guidelines. Proposal Delete it.
OCAD31 2.8.1
proposal. leave it. it was many SC, they
were combined because they all
interrelated and built upon each other.
OCAD27
Proposal: reword
2.6.1 Access to input methods: The user
can have presented any recognized input
methods explicitly associated with an
element, and activate those methods in a
modality independent manner.
OCAD26 "sets"
this is level AAA, I know of no UA that
does this. Suspect it will be eliminated
because of lack of implementation.
Proposal: reword (make it singular)
2.5.3 Configure Elements for Structural
Navigation: The user can configure a set
of important elements (including element
types) for structured navigation and
hierarchical/outline view.
OCAD25 1.10.1
proposal: remove reference for 2.5.1 in
Related resources.
OCAD24 1.10.2
very close to 2.5.1
Proposal: remove 1.10.2
OCAD22 2.3.5 customize keyboard command
proposal: eliminate last sentence
(covered by 2.7.1). remove the sentence
related to key-plus-modifier. That is
covered by overriding accesskey which is
a key plus modifier.
New 2.3.5 Customize Keyboard Commands:
The user can override any keyboard
shortcut including recognized author
supplied shortcuts (e.g. accesskey) and
user agent user interface controls,
except for conventional bindings for the
operating environment (e.g. arrow keys
for navigating within menus).
OCAD16 ERROR should be with 2.1.4
proposal: reword to parallel other SC.
remove word 'author' [next to last word]
2.1.4 Separate Selection from
Activation: The user can specify that
focus and selection can be moved without
causing further changes in focus,
selection, or the state of controls, by
either the user agent or content.
OCAD15 2.1.2
proposal: leave as is. 2.1.2 covers
having a keyboard focus. 1.8.1 is about
the highlighting the viewport that
happens to contain the active keyboard
focus. 1.8.8 is about the history
mechanism for viewports and keyboard
focus. While they are related, the SC
cover separate aspects of viewport and
keyboard focus accessibility.
OCAD12 1.8.8 haven't we done this
already???
--
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 16:03:07 UTC