- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:02:43 -0500
- To: WAI-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1Wk+eC+Z-ObiQ5uheA=NYo95sb2fruTDyAs5yxtXz0SGTA@mail.gmail.com>
5.1.2 OCAD 48 this seems a comment requiring no action. agree that it is central to everything. perhaps make it 5.1.1 ?? how are 4.1.1 different from 5.1.3 4.1.1 Platform Accessibility Services: The user agent supports relevant platform accessibility services. (Level A) 5.1.3 Implement Accessibility Features of platform: If the user agent contains non-web-based user interfaces, then those user interfaces follow user interface accessibility guidelines for the platform. (Level A) 4.1.6 OCAD46 proposal not accepted. 416 items are related to onscreen text. 412 are related to user interface components that have a name, role, state. 4.1.5 OCAD45 This is unrelated to ARIA. it is only to allow AT to write to the interface the same way a user can when using a mouse or keyboard. 3.4.1 OCAD43 This seems like the superset (and so the possible replacement) of 1.8.9 and 2.1.4. agree that 3.4.1 is the more general case that includes 1.8.9 (189 should be removed) and is only about focus changes. except 189 allows configurationa?? 2.1.4 is about change in state of selection for radio buttons and checkboxes when an item receives focus. this is different than moving focus in an unpredictable manner. 2.1.4 should remain as is. 2.11.8 OCAD39 2.11.8 is covered by 1.1.1 and is an implementation detail. remove 2.11.8 add example to 1.1.1 Betty, has an auditory processing problem. she is watching a movie that has several caption and audio tracks . She pulls up a menu to determine which is available she switches between audio tracks until she find one she can understand. She also reinforces the audio by selecting a caption track. 2.10.1 & 2.10.2 OCAD34 & OCAD35 three flash threshold in UI and content. Agree that detecting flashes in content will be very difficult. <blink> is an edge case. remove 2.10.1 and promote 2.10.2 to A (UI should not be doing this anyway, no browser does this so easy check), and change wording of 2.10.2 to : 2.10.2 Three Flashes: In its default configuration, the user agent does not display any user interface componentsthat flashes more than three times in any one-second period (regardless of whether not the flash is below the general flash and red flash thresholds). (Level A) [removed 'or recognized content' and changed level from AAA to A] or keep 2.10.2 at AAA but still change wording. and keep 2.10.1 but change wording to 2.10.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold: In its default configuration, the user agent does not display any user interface components that flashes more than three times in any one-second period, unless the flash is below general flash and red flash thresholds. (Level A) [removed "or recognized content"] OCAD33 2.9.2 time independent, wrong location. Agree, this is not about time independence. the download monitor is informing the user of what is happening. seems better in Understandable (GL4). however, Every browser does this. informing the user about downloading status is basic usability; as long as the download monitor is programatically accessible and its messaging is accessible as per our other guidelines. Proposal Delete it. OCAD31 2.8.1 proposal. leave it. it was many SC, they were combined because they all interrelated and built upon each other. OCAD27 Proposal: reword 2.6.1 Access to input methods: The user can have presented any recognized input methods explicitly associated with an element, and activate those methods in a modality independent manner. OCAD26 "sets" this is level AAA, I know of no UA that does this. Suspect it will be eliminated because of lack of implementation. Proposal: reword (make it singular) 2.5.3 Configure Elements for Structural Navigation: The user can configure a set of important elements (including element types) for structured navigation and hierarchical/outline view. OCAD25 1.10.1 proposal: remove reference for 2.5.1 in Related resources. OCAD24 1.10.2 very close to 2.5.1 Proposal: remove 1.10.2 OCAD22 2.3.5 customize keyboard command proposal: eliminate last sentence (covered by 2.7.1). remove the sentence related to key-plus-modifier. That is covered by overriding accesskey which is a key plus modifier. New 2.3.5 Customize Keyboard Commands: The user can override any keyboard shortcut including recognized author supplied shortcuts (e.g. accesskey) and user agent user interface controls, except for conventional bindings for the operating environment (e.g. arrow keys for navigating within menus). OCAD16 ERROR should be with 2.1.4 proposal: reword to parallel other SC. remove word 'author' [next to last word] 2.1.4 Separate Selection from Activation: The user can specify that focus and selection can be moved without causing further changes in focus, selection, or the state of controls, by either the user agent or content. OCAD15 2.1.2 proposal: leave as is. 2.1.2 covers having a keyboard focus. 1.8.1 is about the highlighting the viewport that happens to contain the active keyboard focus. 1.8.8 is about the history mechanism for viewports and keyboard focus. While they are related, the SC cover separate aspects of viewport and keyboard focus accessibility. OCAD12 1.8.8 haven't we done this already??? -- Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 16:03:07 UTC