- From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:54:12 -0400
- To: "Richards, Jan" <jrichards@ocadu.ca>
- CC: User Agent Working Group <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
I LIKE that. We were trying to come up with a better example (we discussed the problems with Zoom as an example), so I'll change it to yours. On 4/12/2013 3:37 PM, Richards, Jan wrote: > Looks ok to me except that zoom is not a very good example since the user agent can typically handle this if the platform can't.. A better one might be if the platform lacks an accessibility API. A monochrome screen would qualify as well, but feels like a very dated. > > -Jan > > (MR) JAN RICHARDS > PROJECT MANAGER > INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC) > OCAD UNIVERSITY > > T 416 977 6000 x3957 > F 416 977 9844 > E jrichards@ocadu.ca > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jeanne Spellman [mailto:jeanne@w3.org] >> Sent: April-12-13 2:21 PM >> To: User Agent Working Group >> Subject: Proposal for conformance limitations >> >> Kim and I were working on the conformance edits when we saw an opportunity to >> solve one of our outstanding issues with partial >> conformance: The situation when a user agent cannot meet a success criterion >> because of limitations of the platform. >> >> We recommend reading this in context with the rest of the edits we made, because >> it parallels the edited Included/Excluding Technologies section. >> >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2013/ED-UAAG20-20130411/#conformance-req- >> components >> >> The major changes are highlighted. They are 5.d, 6.g, 7 & 8, and a new item 9 - >> Excluded Platform Technologies >> >> jeanne >> > > -- _______________________________ Jeanne Spellman W3C Web Accessibility Initiative jeanne@w3.org
Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 20:54:15 UTC