Re: Proposal for conformance limitations

I LIKE that.  We were trying to come up with a better example (we 
discussed the problems with Zoom as an example), so I'll change it to 
yours.

On 4/12/2013 3:37 PM, Richards, Jan wrote:
> Looks ok to me except that zoom is not a very good example since the user agent can typically handle this if the platform can't.. A better one might be if the platform lacks an accessibility API. A monochrome screen would qualify as well, but feels like a very dated.
>
> -Jan
>
> (MR) JAN RICHARDS
> PROJECT MANAGER
> INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC)
> OCAD UNIVERSITY
>
> T 416 977 6000 x3957
> F 416 977 9844
> E jrichards@ocadu.ca
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jeanne Spellman [mailto:jeanne@w3.org]
>> Sent: April-12-13 2:21 PM
>> To: User Agent Working Group
>> Subject: Proposal for conformance limitations
>>
>> Kim and I were working on the conformance edits when we saw an opportunity to
>> solve one of our outstanding issues with partial
>> conformance:  The situation when a user agent cannot meet a success criterion
>> because of limitations of the platform.
>>
>> We recommend reading this in context with the rest of the edits we made, because
>> it parallels the edited Included/Excluding Technologies section.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2013/ED-UAAG20-20130411/#conformance-req-
>> components
>>
>> The major changes are highlighted.  They are 5.d, 6.g, 7 & 8, and a new item 9 -
>> Excluded Platform Technologies
>>
>> jeanne
>>
>
>

-- 
_______________________________
Jeanne Spellman
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
jeanne@w3.org

Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 20:54:15 UTC