W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 2009

HTML5 Comments on 11.2.5 Fonts and colors

From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:27:31 -0400
Message-ID: <4A8ED903.8070609@w3.org>
To: User Agent Working Group <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
jeanne note: This is not as bad as I first understood it. Closer 
examination shows that this nesting only applies to nesting in the 
article, aside, nav, and section elements. However, I still think it is 
significant and should be pointed out to HTML.

11.2.5 Fonts and colors
states:  <quote>
The article, aside, nav, and section elements are expected to affect the 
font size of h1 elements, based on the nesting depth. If x is a selector 
that matches elements that are either article, aside, nav, or section 
elements, then the following rules capture what is expected:

@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);

x h1 { font-size: 1.50em; }
x x h1 { font-size: 1.17em; }
x x x h1 { font-size: 1.00em; }
x x x x h1 { font-size: 0.83em; }
x x x x x h1 { font-size: 0.67em; }

Issue: Users with low vision adjust font sizes to the minimum size 
needed for comfortable reading. Many users with low vision do not use 
assistive technology, but rather adjust to the largest font size 
supported by the user agent.  Reducing the size of the font - 
particularly a text-dense element like "article" - increases the 
imbalance between font sizes in other parts of the page (e.g. the user 
would be forced to increase font size for the article text to the point 
where the font size in the non-nested parts of the page are enlarged so 
much as to overflow their containers. Automatic reduction of the size is 
unnecessary and will decrease access for users with low vision.

Proposal:  Remove the section. Nested elements should not have the 
containing text size reduced automatically.  The author can choose to 
reduce the size of nested text through CSS, but it should not happen to 
font sizes automatically.

UAAG Issue: I don't think there is a UAAG version of this. This is an 
HTML and CSS issue.
Received on Friday, 21 August 2009 17:27:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:38:40 UTC