- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:00:29 -0500
- To: "'WAI-ua'" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- CC: "'Philippe Le Hegaret'" <plh@w3.org>
Minutes: http://www.w3.org/2008/03/06-ua-minutes.html Action Items: ACTION: KF to To draft some placeholder text for UAAG2 first draft to ensure it is clear we will be dealing with video and multimedia ACTION: JR to Write draft placeholder on keyboard issue Full text: <scribe> Scribe: Jan JB: We have two guests Phillipe and Geoff JA: I'm joining from a line at the airport Meeting during CSUN? JR: Let's just wait for regrets Video Accessibility and UAAG2 - round 2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2008JanMar/0047.html JA: Just wanted to see if Philipe and Geoff read it... ... Are things covered etc. PLH: Looked like a good starting point GF: Has summary that JA sent ... Might be able to give more info in response to questions ... Info is summary looks good - covers most accessibility things JA: PLH had brought up a bunch of things last week - having to do with native browser rendering of videos GF: So yes certainly need stop/start/play need also controls for various tracks,: captions, foreeign langs, subtitles, signing video tracks etc ... Plsayers should be able to identify tracks and turn them on and off PLH: 3 points wondering last time: ... (1) regarding identification of tracks and language...how far do we need to go ... e.g. metadata seems to be missing on whether a track is an audio description GF: In terms of captionning in QT, QT will put metadata on text tracks, then author could rename it a "caption" track ... Then in QT could creat control that looks for it ... In SMIL could do the same thing JR: Is there controlled vocabulary? GF: IN QT example, there is no controlled vocab...my sprite looks for what I call my track ... In SMIL there are test attributes JR: Test attributes? GF: Test attributes: system_captions, system_audiodesc JR: Still not controleled vocab for extended desc ? GF: Righ...done differently for extended audio desc, then ASL is just another video track ... In SMIL filee define video regions eg. in area one main video, ASL in another region JR: How to flow in user control? GF: SMIL players don't supply user control. ... e.g. growing the captions ... But author could do that - eg. button could do it JR: So that hits issue on the head ...UAAG is about flowing user reqs <judy> dick bulterman <plh> Dick Bulterman (CWI) GF: Could ask...Dick Bulterman - SMIL lead ... The WG is working in Venice in a few weeks PHL: 2 main points ... In HTML5 video element - and doc says it is up to user agent to provide captionning... ... So where will these be displayed? ... Overlay on video or next to it. ... Need to provide info back to HTMLWG since they don't think they will be be reflowing GF: Right so could but them on top as layer or beside causing reflow ... No clear version is better ... Personally like it over but can be hard to read ... Can compromise with translkucent bckgrounds ... But some people say too much video is blocked KF: You described techniques but shouldnt' user agent allow user to control what is right for them ... Do you feel that user agents will have enough info allow that conterol GF: would be great if they could but can't think of where this is done JR: Brings up ATRC projects that have done this but needs controlled vocab JA: OK also what about resize the video window (magnify) GF: Can do that now - keyboard shortcuts now to recale player and it scales text ... So that's not a problem PHL: My last question even more open - difference between functionalities avaialble from User Agent and available to Author ... Javascript access to video ... Some things likely would be accessible by author and some by UA ... ex. of captions enable/disable should author have this control? GF: Would say yes....maybe author wants to have more control over the look of the player - maybe even a different skin etc JA: I think being able to skin buttons etc a good idea, but larger control in browser is problematic - eg forget to label a button GF: Can think of only 1 example of player that come with built in control (in Real Player caption controls are buried) ... Can prob think of devs that would be held to a design ... Others might be for it JA: SIMM guidelines or just ours? GF: Def yours, then talk to Dick JA: You've also done work with Flash like things GF: No standard Flash player ... DFXP is just a text format that is in dev at W3C ... Flash and DFXP, DFXP is being used to create captions for Flash ... We created a template and player that allows flash to be produced that can be accessible on our player JA: What is DFXP GF: Just a text format like Real Text ... Supposed to be neutral ... With a bunch of styling and timing information ... NCAM's CCPlayer is just one of those players JA: ALso last time we discussed interaction areas...eg an area might be a link,,,jumping interactive things GF: Alsready possible to put URL's in captions ... Is it keyboardable? ... No ... Certainly no in any plugin ... Haven't seen it in players JB: Want to make sure we get this into existing draft ... Maybe just a big placeholder note GF: Off the top of my head, if keyboard command to move focus to player... ... could pause video then move around JR: Points towards more active UA role, eg extract to list of links GF: Right, that might be more readily acheivable PHL: Would like to follow up of DFSP DFXP JB: In terms of how to get this into drat JR: Think draft covers this intrinisically dso maybe just notes <judy> JR: we could say something like "the WG does intend this to apply to..." KF: Maybe we need to be more explicit...WG intends to publish more excplicit requirements in video and interactive animation space JB: I would support KF's approach KF, JB: We appreciate this conversation and hope you can return when relevant JB: Would really help coordinate things ... And maybe could talk about issues such as why 2 captionning formats ... So W3C can get rationale for this out there GF: Talking about DFXP and SMIL text? JB: Yes ... Maybe PHL and I can brainstorm this a bit <scribe> ACTION: KF to To draft some placeholder text for UAAG2 first draft to ensure it is clear we will be dealing with video and multimedia [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/06-ua-minutes.html#action01] When is UAAG2 ready for 1st public working draft? JB: KF you're read all the way through? KF: Going through a third time. Getting to picky comments JB: Skimmed....seems more than adequate for first working draft ... Notice Acknowledgments out of date http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2008/WD-UAAG20-20080220/WD-UAAG20-20080220.html JA: So big chunks are from UAAG1 JB: Yes need it updated ... Maybe change header to "Participants active in the UAWG leading up to time of publication" ... Also add in Judy JR: Also...there is: "Other previously active UAWG participants and other contributors to UAAG 2.0" JB: Maybe "Active or Recently Active" as first one... JA: WHat about Geoff and Phillippe JB: Would need to ask their permission ... So Kathy, Peter, Dave P, maybe Geoff, maybe Phillipe to "Other previously active UAWG participants and other contributors to UAAG 2.0:" ... Other than that any objections? KF: Maybe a bit rough at CSUN JB: Would really like it up before Thursday next week and also before AC in April ... First draft can be rough KF: For my perspecivtive I'm ok to go JA: Me too JR: OK JB: Aim for Wednesday, but also dependent on Shawn, Judy, Jules JR: OK KF: Must get off call in 2 mins JB Thinks there is additional work on it JB: So propose a placeholder for this draft <scribe> ACTION: JR to Write draft placeholder on keyboard issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/06-ua-minutes.html#action02] JB: Feel that this area can cause weird breakdowns of understanding\ KF: Thinks disconnect is that people affected see the need SO clearly JA: So should we put in what we have so far? JB: Let's put in placeholder text ... With latest version...took chrome out of it.... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2008JanMar/0052.html JA: I keep thinking there are like 4 things we need to do... ... Seems muddled at the moment JB: Education for me in TEITAC...there are lots of other aspects of this ... Things are broken off and put elsewhere ... e.g. documentation section etc ... I think its so complicated we need to take some time to think this over Jim Allan wrote: > User Agent Teleconference for March 6 2008 (new time 2pm Eastern) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Chair: Jim Allan > Date: Thursday, March 6 2008 > Time: 2:00-3:00 pm Boston Local Time, USA (19:00-20:00 UTC/GMT) > Call-in: Zakim bridge at: +1-617-761-6200, code 82941# for UK use > 44-117-270-6152 > IRC: sever: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #ua. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Regrets: > > Agenda: > > 0. Regrets, agenda requests, or comments to the list > > 1. Meeting during CSUN? > > 2. Video Accessibility and UAAG2 - round 2 > - Invited guests Philippe Le Hegaret (W3C) & Geoff Freed (WGBH-NCAM) > - Video synthesis of round 1 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2008JanMar/0047.html > > Anything missing? > Where to incorporate in UAAG2? > > 3. Review Keyboard Access > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2008JanMar/0052.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2008JanMar/0053.html > > > 4. When is UAAG2 ready for 1st public working draft? > - What is the W3 process? > - What are the working group's task related to issuing a public > draft? > > Jim Allan, Webmaster & Statewide Technical Support Specialist > Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired > 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 > voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ >>>> Share to Win! <<< > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Jan Richards, M.Sc. User Interface Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) Faculty of Information Studies University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:59:37 UTC