Minutes for User Agent Teleconference for January 24, 2008

http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-ua-minutes.html

ACTION: JR to Look into a TR draft of UAAG 2.0 by CSUN
ACTION: JR to Look through UAAG for things to pull together with 10.1 
into a cascades of associations requirement
ACTION: JR rewording ideas for 10.1.
ACTION: JR rewording ideas for 10.2.

Full text:

<scribe> Scribe: Jan

<oedipus> calling in a minute -- html call went a tad long

<oedipus> i'll still call in

<oedipus> GJR's ARIA status report:

<oedipus> ARIA Suite will now contain: 1) ARIA Roadmap; 2) Roles, 
States, and Properties for Accessible Rich Internet Applications 
(combination of 2 previously seperate documents); 3) ARIA Best 
Practices; and 4) ARIA Primer (new)

<oedipus> two approaches to embedding ARIA:

<oedipus> 1) no namespaces, no prefixes -- host languages reserve all 
attribute names matching the pattern aria-*. This allows the ARIA states 
and properties to be controlled by the PFWG specification, including 
future maintenance.

<oedipus> 2) by Namespaces in XML -- Role Attribute Module () will give 
@role a 'home' namespace from which it can be cited using the Namespaces 
in XML Recommendation technique, so that ARIA can be used in DIAL and 
other dialects of XHTML, which are likely to be used primarily to feed 
middleware, as there is no immediate prospect of this technology being 
picked up widely by browsers any time soon

<oedipus> GJR: ARIA work listed as 1 of 4 deliverables -- matt may of 
adobe in PF, but lurking more than participating

Work on GL 10
JA: CSUN coming up in 6 weeks

<scribe> ACTION: JR to Look into a TR draft of UAAG 2.0 by CSUN 
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-ua-minutes.html#action01]

<AllanJ> Jan review GL 10

<AllanJ> 10.1 Associate table cells and headers

<oedipus> UIA discussion in open a11y: 
http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Accessiblity/Minutes/Minutes20080123

<AllanJ> this is just a special case of associating labels with the 
thing they label

<AllanJ> GR: ARIA may mitigate- collisions of bindings

<AllanJ> with screen readers you must be in table reading mode, and 
loose other information

<AllanJ> problems with screen reader non-stateless browsing

<AllanJ> ...forms mode, table mode, links, acronyms, etc.

<AllanJ> JR: perhaps move to interacting checkpoints

<oedipus> expert handlers CSUN 2008 panel 
http://accessibility.linux-foundation.org/a11yweb/presentations/csun2008/open_a11y.html

<oedipus> GJR: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ExplicitAssociationPatterns

<AllanJ> JA: this is good. associations are fine in isolation, what 
about combinitorics of associations

<AllanJ> GJR: see tabindex on ESW page

<AllanJ> second example shows using tabindex to change default tabbing 
order, and with screen reader you cannot be in table and forms mode at 
the same time

<AllanJ> example shows html 5 coding

<AllanJ> JR: if selection on Grooms last name, what is problem?

<AllanJ> GJR: depends if scope is supported.

<AllanJ> ...even if header/id binding, by navigating into form control, 
the title trumps all other associations, so user would have to query 
other information...

<AllanJ> leave forms mode, switch to table mode.

<AllanJ> JR: layers of label,

<AllanJ> JA: like conditional content

<AllanJ> JR: but its not. conditional content appears and disappears, 
this information is always there

<AllanJ> ... but user may had difficulty accessing it.

GR: Maybe tie in with ubiquitous web...

<AllanJ> GJR: ubiquitious web application. Screen reader users and 
mobile device user share similar access issues

<AllanJ> ... onus on the author.

JA: Can some of cond content stuff handle 10.1?
... Or do we need more...
... Really think cascade of associations is really important

<scribe> ACTION: JR to Look through UAAG for things to pull together 
with 10.1 into a cascades of associations requirment [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-ua-minutes.html#action02]

GR: Maybe talk to Rich S about this
... He's bringing these issues to ubiquitous web group

<AllanJ> complex table http://www.tsbvi.edu/technology/web/508/43.htm

<AllanJ> http://www.tsbvi.edu/technology/web/508/44.htm

10.2 Highlight selection, content focus, enabled elements, visited links
<AllanJ> - Highlighting "Enabled elements" may be problematic in an AJAX 
context

<AllanJ> in AJAX the control is out of tab order. with widgets all 
interwoven elements what gets the highlight

<AllanJ> - what if link used as a button?

<AllanJ> - "do not rely on rendered text foreground and background 
colors alone" seems to mean mean "use a border"?

<AllanJ> JA: yes, use border

<AllanJ> PR is reviewing "selectors api" from WEBapi group

<AllanJ> PR=PF

GR: PF is reviewing the "Selector's API" from Web Applications group

JA: Thinks AJAX one is most problematic

<oedipus> Selectors API - http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/

<oedipus> ABSTRACT: Selectors, which are widely used in CSS, are 
patterns that match against elements in a tree structure [Selectors] 
[CSS21]. The Selectors API specification defines methods for retrieving 
Element nodes from the DOM by matching against a group of selectors. It 
is often desirable to perform DOM operations on a specific set of 
elements in a document. These methods simplify the process of aquiring 
specific elements, especially compared with the more verbose

JR: Saying remove the out in #4

<AllanJ> JR: hilight 'recognized' elements, for elements with 'aria' 
roles state then aria would control highlighting

<oedipus> some users will be only able to interact with the graphic as 
an object, and will not be able to access content contained in the 
object because rather than using declaritive markup to distinguish and 
label the links conatined in the object are scripted links which contain 
no hyperlink text nor any programmatic binding to a textual equivalent 
defined for them

<scribe> ACTION: JR rewording ideas for 10.1. [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-ua-minutes.html#action03]

<scribe> ACTION: JR rewording ideas for 10.2. [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-ua-minutes.html#action04]

<oedipus> quit

Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: JR rewording ideas for 10.1. [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-ua-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: JR rewording ideas for 10.2. [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-ua-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to Look into a TR draft of UAAG 2.0 by CSUN [recorded 
in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-ua-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to Look through UAAG for things to pull together with 
10.1 into a cascades of associations requirment [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/24-ua-minutes.html#action02]

Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 23:24:44 UTC