- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:31:16 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
aloha! i'm not sure whether the following falls under 3.6 or 3.7 or in a checkpoint of its own: 1. Allow configuration to allow simultaneous rendering of an image and its long descriptor use cases: 1. user with severely restricted viewport needs guidance through the flow of the image; 2. are users with cognitive processing issues who will require guidance through the detailed description (more use cases at: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/LongdescRetention the page name is misleading, as the actual title of the page is "Image Equivalent Content", the "Requirement" of which is recorded thus: "In situations where images are not available to the user (because of disability, choice, or UA limitation) there is a need for a mechanism that presents equivalent content to the user, either as an alternative to the image or in a side-by-side exposition. Equivalent content is not, nor should it be, and either/or proposition, and its method of exposition should be subject to user control, as some user groups may need both the image and its detailed description in order to make sense of the image or — in the case of a user with an extremely small viewport — to follow the image's flow." and, yes, if that sounds familiar, its because i wrote it) as for the "doing more" portion, here is what i verbally proposed at today's telecon: --- DOING MORE --- Support for ARIA concept of "context menus" for objects/elements: 1. expose entire range of possibilities available to the user via a context menu 2. limit range of possibilities to user-defined pre-selection (via preferences) 3. exclude/include content-types/formats through UA's user preferences No matter which setting the user sets as the default, there must be a mechanism that enables the exposure of the full range of possibilities -- even when a user has pre-set what content-types to include, as the author may not have provided any conditional/alternative content that meets the user's pre-set criterion. It is for this reason that support for ARIA context menus is strongly encouraged, as they can display the entire range of controls and options available to the end user. --- END DOING MORE --- RESOURCE NOTE FOR UAWG: Note: the first instances of the string "context menus" should link to the ARIA document or the ARIA Best Practices document (which currently exists only on the ESW wiki, but which is being pulled together into a W3C note) Relevant ARIA Properties: 1. latest PF Editor's draft (member-confidential) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/adaptable/#haspopup http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/adaptable/#controls http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/adaptable/#owns 2. latest public draft http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-aria-state-20071019/#haspopup http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-aria-state-20071019/#controls http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-aria-state-20071019/#owns ------------------------------------------------------------------ "Kill the rattlesnake that gives no warning; spare the one that does." -- Lenni Lenape proverb ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net> Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus/ UBATS - United Blind Advocates for Talking Signs: http://ubats.org ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 18:31:33 UTC