- From: Peter Parente <pparent@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:06:51 -0400
- To: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Cc: WAU-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFFAA8898F.D6DF2BC4-ON85257332.0042464A-85257332.00428583@us.ibm.com>
"Programmatically determined" is a much better word to use, especially if it's already defined in other W3C documents. It has the same meaning as what I intended with the more vague term "deterministically." 1. This checkpoint does not apply when the user agent cannot programmatically determine content to be audio, video, animated images, or animated/blinking text. Pete Peter Parente pparent@us.ibm.com Tie: 526-2346 IBM: 919-486-2346 Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.e du> To Peter Parente/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 08/08/2007 05:43 cc PM WAU-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org> Subject RE: Proposal to combine 3.2 and 3.3 I like it. have a question about Normative inclusions and exclusions: 1. This checkpoint does not apply for content the user agent cannot deterministically recognize as audio, video, animated images, or animated/blinking text. what is "deterministically", is it something UAAG needs to define or explain. Is deterministically the application side of WCAG's "programmatically determinable"? Jim
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: pic26733.gif
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 12:07:11 UTC