- From: Peter Parente <pparent@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:06:51 -0400
- To: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Cc: WAU-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFFAA8898F.D6DF2BC4-ON85257332.0042464A-85257332.00428583@us.ibm.com>
"Programmatically determined" is a much better word to use, especially if
it's already defined in other W3C documents. It has the same meaning as
what I intended with the more vague term "deterministically."
1. This checkpoint does not apply when the user agent cannot
programmatically determine content to be audio, video, animated images, or
animated/blinking text.
Pete
Peter Parente
pparent@us.ibm.com
Tie: 526-2346
IBM: 919-486-2346
Jim Allan
<jimallan@tsbvi.e
du> To
Peter Parente/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
08/08/2007 05:43 cc
PM WAU-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Subject
RE: Proposal to combine 3.2 and 3.3
I like it. have a question about
Normative inclusions and exclusions:
1. This checkpoint does not apply for content the user agent cannot
deterministically recognize as audio, video, animated images, or
animated/blinking text.
what is "deterministically", is it something UAAG needs to define or
explain. Is deterministically the application side of WCAG's
"programmatically determinable"?
Jim
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: pic26733.gif
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 12:07:11 UTC