- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 23:23:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Aaron Smith <aaron@gwmicro.com>
- Cc: WAI UA group <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Aaron Smith wrote: ... >To be honest, I flipped a coin when deciding which W3 group to post to. >Perhaps reading documentation might be a better avenue next time. Please do that. (This is by no means some evil thing that Aaron has done and nobody else ever did... me included :-( Of the many messages I delete each day as spam, a large minority are legitmate useful mail, but not relevant to the list it was sent to. (There is a smaller inority of false positives I delete because people don't think about the subject line if they are replying). For the validators, they each have their own mailing list - they are tools which try to provide accurate testing, and like all tools they have bugs from time to time. Those bugs are not normally due to the spec (if they do highlight something wrong with a spec, that should go to the right people...) Cheers Chaals
Received on Saturday, 9 October 2004 03:23:50 UTC