- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 20 Feb 2003 15:21:18 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Hello, Minutes available as HTML [1] and as text below. - Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/02/20-ua-summary.html ============================================================= Minutes of 20 Feb 2003 UAWG teleconference Present: Jon Gunderson (Chair), Cathy Laws, David Poehlman, Harvey Bingham, Colin Kotoles, Ian Jacobs. Regrets: Matt May Previous meeting: [1]6 Feb 2003 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2003JanMar/0018.html Next meeting: 27 Feb 2003. Regrets: DP, IJ The UAWG meets ftf 6-7 March in Boston. We decided we didn't need teleconf capabilities. Review of FTF agenda Discussion of [2]Agenda [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2003/03/ua-meeting - QA Docs to be reviewed - Dependency tracking tools - Process for groups requesting specific test suite cases - Status of UAWG test suite work - Getting UAWG desired tests into test suites of other groups. JG: For discussions with PF/HTML WGs, we have a list of things to talk about based on our test suite work. CL: I'll do demo with telephony Friday morning. Action UAWG: Read XHTML 2.0 [To be discussed next week] JG: QAWG has published three docs in last call Implementation reports and test suites JG: Lots of activity in this area. -- Matt submitted new review of IE5 Mac -- I have some students working on reviews IJ: QAWG has asked that we allow review of UAAG 1.0 against QA guidelines to be made public. Is that ok? Resolved: Yes Action IJ: Say to Lynne Rosenthal that we are fine with that; maybe by talking to her we can get AAA. JG: In terms of current evaluation reports, students working on IE, Realplayer, Mozilla. CL is working on HPR. JG: People are going through the current test suite. IJ: See the QAWG guidelines for info about contributing tests. [UAWG notes that there are well-formedness errors in xml files of HTML test suite] Action Colin: Debug this XML problem in test suite sources Test suites JG: Being well-used right now. We will have some new tests soon; some of the tests are broken (markup) and we'll fix. HB: What about EARL usage? JG: We are not yet using EARL. IJ: We should give them input based on our experience. IJ: I am not tracking EARL progress. JG: Could talk to Wendy at ftf meeting. JG: Advantages of EARL are, e.g., testing tools. Involving Beijing JG: Difficult for folks in Beijing to join given our current schedule. What about 8am ET/7 am CT? JG: I'd like to have an intro call first, before we reschedule a bunch of meetings. HB: Would be good to find out what Chinese policies relate to accessibility. Action JG: Set up an intro meeting in the morning with Beijing folks. Education and outreach JG: We're meeting with JB and EOWG at ftf meeting There is also a meeting on Friday to discuss the [3]WAI Glossary (IJ, HB to attend) [3] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/Glossary/printable.html IJ: UAAG 1.0 reference really old! * UAAG10: Working Draft User Agent Accessibility Guidelines, 2000-07-28 UAAG 1.0 Action IJ: Ask glossary authors if they can/intend to update the references to UAAG 1.0. -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2003 15:21:29 UTC