Re: Proposed requirements for checkpoint 6.4 (Response Required)

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> Works  for me.
> 
> Does this have to be the rendered form, the author-specified form, or are
> either OK? (For example, an author may have specified two different fonts,
> and the User Agent may render the first one, or the second if it lacks the
> first, or neither, if it doesn't have them. Alternatively they may have been
> overridden by an author style sheet, or a high-contrast setting might be
> causing rendering in black and white when the autor has specified several
> colours).

The goal of this checkpoint is to make available what's *actually*
rendered.

This would be a good clarification.

  - Ian


> 
> Charles
> 
> 
>>Please RESPOND as soon as possible to this e-mail on whether you agree or
>>disagree with the changes.
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2002 16:05:38 UTC