Re: Low vision usage

At 02:24 PM 2001-11-07 , David Poehlman wrote:
>Al, The answer is yes.  Some times, the image details are just too
>difficult to see or the image contrast is not good enough or the person
>has vision severe enough that images are not good ways for them to
>attain info but they can still read the text.

Thank you, David.  

May I ask a follow-up clarifying question?

What you said here could describe a case where the image is completely useless
and simply giving the user the text is as good as it gets.

But that may not be what you meant.  I meant to ask, are there in between
people for whom the image is perceptually degraded to the point that the
from the text is highly valuable; but still there is residual utility in the
image perception so that the text alone is inferior to having access to the
text with image, together.  


>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Al Gilman" <>
>To: <>
>Cc: <>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 2:07 PM
>Subject: RE: Low vision usage
>At 10:35 AM 2001-11-07 , wrote:
>>> I would send the suggestions to the User Agent group list
>>> ( Tim Lacy is currently the Microsoft contact
>>> participating in the User Agent working group.
>>Thanks Jon.
>>Issue: alt text on images, for low vision users.
>>If I have screen fonts set to large,
>>alt text remains the same size, it doesn't increase
>>proportionately to the screen font.
>>(Its the same on java tooltips btw).
>>Whats it like on opera or amaya or Netscape?)
>Are there some low vision users who should be able to have both the ALT
>image shown at the same time? So the ALT is there to explain what is in
>image of which you see a fragment?
>There was the suggestion earlier [failing to find reference at the
>LD users should have access to both the text equivalent and the image
>equivalent, displayed together.
>>Regards DaveP.
>>NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
>>confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
>>intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
>>disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
>>you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
>>immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
>>RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
>>attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
>>cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
>>transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
>>Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
>>and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
>>represent those of RNIB.
>>RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 14:45:27 UTC