- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:53:01 -0500 (EST)
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- cc: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
I think that for people with cognitive disabilities this is a low P1 or high P2 requirement. For people without a disability this is a handy repair feature - p3 or just scraping p2. The problem is that people can get used to the idea of trying each linked image easily, but the idea that an image is broken into several links is harder to figure out. Charles On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jon Gunderson wrote: Charles, Is this a priority 1 requirement or just a nice feature? Does a person without a disability have the same problem? Jon At 09:32 AM 2/19/2001 -0500, you wrote: >For someone using a visual method and a mouse the most likely way of hitting >the imagemap is to pass over it with the mouse and notice the cursor change. >This seems inadequate to me. > >it can be done with css2: > >*[usemap] { border-style: double } > >Charles > >On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, jon gunderson wrote: > > As the user moves the focus to elements of the image map there is a > requirement for the indivdiual elements to be highlighted. The 458 issue > was a highlight of the image to indicate to the user that there are active > elements within the image. > > The group felt that as long as the user knew the image map had active > elements that that was sufficient and the invidual elements of the map > could be explored as the user moves focus to elements within the image > map. > > Jon > > > On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Ian Jacobs wrote: > > > > 5.Issue 458: Do link highlighting requirements apply to all zones of an > > image map? > > What is required granularity? > > Source: > > http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#458 > > > > [snip] > > Resolved: > > a) Add a note to 8.3 that highlighting an image map as a whole > > satisfies the checkpoint for image maps. UA may highlight > > all of the hot spots of a client-side map. > > b) There is some assumption that the author will make the image > > communicate different zones. We choose not to add a repair > > requirement for the case of bad images. > > > > CMN > > I am concerned that this is the wrong move. It should at least be > possible to > > highlight in visual some way the hotspots of an image. After all, the > > author's responsibility in highlighting the hotspots of any other > link only > > extends to identifying it as a link and letting the browser do the rest. > > > > Implementation example is Amaya. Probably other examples from image-map > > creation tools. > > > > Charles cCN > > > > >-- >Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 >134 136 >W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 >258 5999 >Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia >(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, >France) Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services MC-574 College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 19 February 2001 16:53:03 UTC