RE: Meaning of "important special case"

Seems reasonable...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 4:47 PM
> To: Hansen, Eric
> Cc: UA List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Meaning of "important special case"
> 
> 
> "Hansen, Eric" wrote:
> > 
> > I can see what you are saying, but it sort of begs the 
> question, "If it is
> > so 'important' and 'special', why isn't it _at least_ as 
> important (in terms
> > of priority) as the checkpoint of which it is a special case?"
> > 
> > I tend to think of a special case as a 'subset' or a closer look at
> > something and that an 'important' special case would be at least as
> > important in terms of 'priority'.....
> > 
> > Maybe we should say that checkpoint 9.6 (P3) is an 
> "_unimportant_ special
> > case" of checkpoint 9.3 (P2)....!?
> 
> Or just "special case"
> 
>  - Ian
> 
> -- 
> Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
> Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
>

Received on Thursday, 25 January 2001 16:53:48 UTC